NEW DELHI: Delhi HC rebuked Wikipedia Monday for its resistance to disclose user information and took a dim view of its attempts to pressurise (sic) a judge hearing a defamation plea against the information aggregator.
"We are warning you. You may be the world's most powerful entity but we live in a country governed by the rule of law. You may lose safe harbour privilege as an intermediary," a bench of Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela told the counsel for Wikipedia while hearing its challenge against a single-judge bench's order to disclose user information in the defamation case filed by a news agency. The court had asked for identities of users who allegedly made defamatory edits to the news agency's Wikipedia page.
The bench was appalled to find out that even as the matter was sub judice, a page on Wikipedia made comments on the case. "Who created this page? You have not been able to restrain your client to ensure dignity and decorum is maintained. You can't threaten a judge or pressurise (sic) like this. This page will have to be taken down, otherwise, we won't hear you," an angry bench told Wikipedia's senior lawyer Akhil Sibal.
The court rejected the argument of the online platform against the disclosure of identities of users who allegedly made the defamatory edits. "Your system cannot be a cloak to defame someone. If a user is saying the news organisation works for RAW and is against Pakistan, you are putting them in danger. Just put yourself in their shoes," the court told Sibal when the advocate argued for protecting user anonymity and requested to be heard on this aspect.
The defamation suit accuses Wikipedia of allowing the defamatory edits referring to the news agency as a "propaganda tool" for the govt. The agency has sought removal of the edited content and Rs 2 crore as damages.
HC made it clear that Wikipedia's stance could jeopardise its intermediary protection under the Information Technology Act . It had earlier warned the platform it may be blocked in India if it doesn't comply with its laws. The single judge had taken a strong view of the open-source platform's failure to furnish details of subscribers who edited the news agency's page.
"We are warning you. You may be the world's most powerful entity but we live in a country governed by the rule of law. You may lose safe harbour privilege as an intermediary," a bench of Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela told the counsel for Wikipedia while hearing its challenge against a single-judge bench's order to disclose user information in the defamation case filed by a news agency. The court had asked for identities of users who allegedly made defamatory edits to the news agency's Wikipedia page.
The bench was appalled to find out that even as the matter was sub judice, a page on Wikipedia made comments on the case. "Who created this page? You have not been able to restrain your client to ensure dignity and decorum is maintained. You can't threaten a judge or pressurise (sic) like this. This page will have to be taken down, otherwise, we won't hear you," an angry bench told Wikipedia's senior lawyer Akhil Sibal.
The court rejected the argument of the online platform against the disclosure of identities of users who allegedly made the defamatory edits. "Your system cannot be a cloak to defame someone. If a user is saying the news organisation works for RAW and is against Pakistan, you are putting them in danger. Just put yourself in their shoes," the court told Sibal when the advocate argued for protecting user anonymity and requested to be heard on this aspect.
The defamation suit accuses Wikipedia of allowing the defamatory edits referring to the news agency as a "propaganda tool" for the govt. The agency has sought removal of the edited content and Rs 2 crore as damages.
HC made it clear that Wikipedia's stance could jeopardise its intermediary protection under the Information Technology Act . It had earlier warned the platform it may be blocked in India if it doesn't comply with its laws. The single judge had taken a strong view of the open-source platform's failure to furnish details of subscribers who edited the news agency's page.
You may also like
Teens extort Rs 7L from 12-year-old girl
British war photographer found murdered in mountainous area
Who Was Guilherme 'Bomba' Vasconcelos? MMA Fighter Dies At 38
Princess Kate's powerful message of 'love, strength and hope' over baby loss tragedy
Maharashtra Assembly Elections 2024: Government Issues 244 Resolutions Hours Before Poll Announcement
Sri Lankan Airlines Captain Locks Co-Pilot Out Of Cockpit After Mid-Air Argument, Gets Grounded
Cong panel to submit tech report on EVM
Rats and 'fire-starting squirrels' set to invade Britain's homes to avoid winter freeze
Man Utd move to terminate Sir Alex Ferguson contract slammed by Dwight Yorke
13 players who featured for Liverpool and Chelsea including Fernando Torres and forgotten stars
Coronation Street fans 'work out' pregnancy bombshell after Joel Deering confirmed dead
Quota row puts an out-of-sync Mahayuti in a tighter spot
Mumbai: BMC Appoints Project Management Consultant For Coastal Road Phase 2, Investing ₹559 Crore In Services
Prince William's surprising talent he learned when he was younger
Man shows off world's smallest home that measures just 19 square feet and costs him tiny sum
Traitors' Harry Clark axed from Celebrity SAS after he was caught lying during interrogation
Top 4 Must-Have Protections In Your Travel Insurance Policy
Rio Ferdinand reveals England dressing room reaction to Thomas Tuchel appointment
The Yorkshire Vet star 'devastated' as lamb dies on operating table after life-saving surgery
EC modifies Sharad faction symbol for more visibility on EVM